Thanks Brenton, see my replies inline: On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 08:24:52 -0500, Breton Imhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > >That being said, overlooking or ignoring Co:Z is always a great injustice. >Pretty much everyone on this list will tout its merits. >
I would really like to use Co:Z, I'm trying to figure out if I am allowed to here. >I’m also amazed how often people think sftp is the only OpenSSH replacement >for ftp. Most of my users were transferring single text files with an ftp >step. Demonstrating how to use scp instead of sftp reduces the complexity >enough to make it a more viable option. I do use scp for ascii files, but in this case I have a need for binary transfers. >Also, if it’s a text file on disk, you might want to experiment with letting >the ssh transfer be driven by the client side. Unfortunately not an option either. > >Breton Imhauser >Acxiom Corp., LLC. > Dana ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
