Can't answer your question but it reminds me of a long-standing conjecture of mine:
I wonder if compilers plant idiomatic machine code - from which higher-level constructs can be garnered. I would expect "optimising" (prefer "improving") compilers would defeat that. Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: Itschak Mugzach <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 18/04/2015 17:46 Subject: FORTRAN reverse engineering Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> I have three (quit complex) FORTRAN load modules which I do not have the source code of. I Know the Source company, but they deal with Cobol, and I need Fortran. Any idea how to reverse engineering the load modules? ITschak ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
