Hi liz,

I do not find any other module apart from LINKLIST or LPALIST.

What kind of difference is between LPALIST or LINKLIST when it comes to
SORT ? I see them in both. No dynamic addition.

I am going to OPEN a SR but Just wanted to give a try in IBM MAIN.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> First, could you post all of the DFSORT messages from both LPARs.
> Sometimes there are clues in other messages.
>
> Second, have you used ISRDDN under ISPF to see if there are any other
> DFSORT modules other than where you expect them in the LINKLST or LPALIST?
>
> Third, have you verified that the linklst and lpalst are identical?  No
> one has done a dynamic change to the linklst or lpalst on either system?
>
> Lastly, why no open an SR with IBM.  It will probably be faster for the
> DFSORT team to assist you.
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Nathan Astle
> > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:41 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Challenge with DFSORT
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The DFSORT are not generating a DEFAULT value in 1 lpar but the other
> lpar
> > are able to Generate though they use the same Respack.
> >
> > The JCL :
> >
> > //SORTDATE EXEC
> > PGM=SORT,REGION=1024K,PARM='CORE=1024K',COND=(0,NE)
> > //*
> > //SYSOUT   DD SYSOUT=*
> > //SORTIN   DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE,DISP=SHR
> > //SORTOUT  DD DSN=NATHAN.DATE1,DISP=SHR
> > //SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
> > //SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
> > //SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
> > //SORTWK04 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
> > //SORTWK05 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
> > //SORTWK06 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(50,20),RLSE)
> > //SYSIN    DD  *
> >   OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
> > /*
> >
> > Result from the Working LPAR :
> >
> > ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
> >
> > ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
> > E5-K72040
> > ICE143I 0 BLOCKSET     COPY  TECHNIQUE SELECTED
> >
> > ICE250I 0 VISIT http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort FOR DFSORT PAPERS,
> > EXAMPLES AN ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS
> > DFSORT V1R12 - 01:56 ON MON AP
> >             OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
> >
> > ICE201I H RECORD TYPE IS F - DATA STARTS IN POSITION 1
> >
> > ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 C7-K58148 C8-K67572 E9-K60824 C9-BASE
> > E5-K72040
> > ICE193I 0 ICEAM1 INVOCATION ENVIRONMENT IN EFFECT - ICEAM1
> > ENVIRONMENT SELECTED ICE252I 1 PARMLIB OPTIONS WERE MERGED WITH
> > INSTALLATION MODULE DEFAULTS
> >
> >
> >
> > Result from the Non-working LPAR :
> >
> > ICE805I 1 JOBNAME: TEST120W , STEPNAME: SORTDATE
> >
> > ICE802I 0 BLOCKSET     TECHNIQUE IN CONTROL
> >
> > ICE000I 1 - CONTROL STATEMENTS FOR 5694-A01, Z/OS DFSORT V1R12 - 01:07
> > ON MON AP
> >            OUTREC FIELDS=(1:1,8,9:10,8,64X)
> >
> > ICE010A 0 NO SORT OR MERGE CONTROL STATEMENT
> >
> > ICE751I 0 C5-K62149 C6-K90026 E7-K70685
> >
> > ICE052I 3 END OF DFSORT
> >
> >
> >
> > Both the LPAR are in same Sysplex, Use the same SORT loadlibs, Share the
> > DASD too. Not sure why the results are differents and the Defaults are
> not
> > generated.
> >
> > Could someone please share your thoughts.
> >
> > z/OS : 1.12
> >
> > Nathan
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to