Skip:

I remember the APAR. I got awaken at 11PM because of the stupid return code and had to come in to fix it. The temporary solution was to code the SR 15,15 and br 14. The next day I called it in and there already was PE'd and the me to list was a mile long. I asked to be put on the list as well, I put the sev as 4 as I had fixed it manually. I made sure everyone in the group was aware of the issue in case they got any calls.

Ed


On May 4, 2015, at 1:47 PM, J O Skip Robinson wrote:

You might wonder what could go wrong in such a simple program. I never saw it, but heard tell that the earliest version of IEFBR14 went PE because it contained only one instruction: BR 14. That left the return code totally unpredictable, so a PTF was released to SR 15,15. Maybe an urban legend, but one too precious to debunk.

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- [email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IEFBR14 question

If the dataset already exists then it doesn't try to create it and you do not need the SPACE parm. But if it does not exist it first creats it, and then deletes it. So you need the SPACE parm.




----- Original Message -----
From: Scott Ford <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: IEFBR14 question

Peter,

Thank you very much ...haven't seen the message before ...

Regards,
Scott

On Monday, May 4, 2015, Farley, Peter x23353 <[email protected]>
wrote:

SPACE=(0,0) eliminates the message.  I usually also use UNIT=SYSDA,
but YMMV.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]
<javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:54 AM
To: [email protected] <javascript:;>
Subject: IEFBR14 question

All,

I just came across something I haven't seen. I am building some canned JCL and I was testing a IEFBR14 step doing disp= (mod,delete,delete) on
non-existent datasets wanting to see the return code passed back and
saw this....

IGD17045I Space not specified for allocation of data set.

This is non-SMS ...

I am confused...guys and gals.

Regards,
Scott

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to