On Tue, 26 May 2015 19:18:02 -0400 Jim Mulder <[email protected]> wrote:
:>>I am trying to issue a tailored SVC dump and am finding that there are :>many :>>absolute storage records filling the dump - many more since zos/1.10 :>>I specify SDATA=(NODEFS,NOALLPSA,NOSQA) - what more do I need to specify? :> How did you determine that there are many absolute storage records? Did :>you :>count the number of records whose dump record prefix starts with 'DR2 A .' Yes. Also do a LISTDUMP and found more than x'05------' (80M) bytes described in ABSOLUTE. USING SDUMPX directed to a DCB. By changing it to use LIST64 instead of SUMLIST64 and using SDATA=(,NOSUM) reduced the ABSOLUTE to about 28M. The issue is that I try to allocate the output dataset to the size I need (as it must be CONTIG) and found the amount of "overhead" storage went up quite a bit from zos1.10. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
