On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Thomas Conley <[email protected]> wrote: <snip>
> John, > > Good points all, but Gil wants to have multiple ISPF sessions on the same > LPAR. TSO currently doesn't support that natively, it's only supported in > z/OSMF. > > I'm surprised that you limit multiple concurrent logons in the sysplex to > just a handful of id's. I'm curious why you don't take advantage of shared > profiles for your entire ISPF community. I've done a lot of work on this > subject, so it's near and dear to my heart. You can find the gory details > here http://tinyurl.com/prnmh48. > "There's no reason, it's just policy.". Basically, we just to just have a single image. The programmers were complaining that they couldn't get anything done because production kept using up all of the CPU. I was not allowed to address this using WLM. I tried. So, to shut them up, we split the "test and model office" into a separate system image, but in the same sysplex so that we could easily share things. However, IMO, we "punished" the programmers by telling them that they could only be on one image at a time. And that they could only use CA-Endevor on the test image. IOW "politics". > > Regards, > Tom Conley > > -- My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the seashore. If someone tell you that nothing is impossible: Ask him to dribble a football. He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
