On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:36:52 -0300, Clark Morris wrote: > >I have processed SMF types 14/15, 30, 62 and 64 with COBOL. I reading >the VBS files you need RECORDING S on the FD. The major pains are >having to have separate FD (file descriptors) for VB and VBS, having >to be indirect in dealing with bit fields and 1 byte binary and there >being no mechanical way to get the SMF record descriptions. Actually >COBOL could be made more useful by having a tool that converts DSECTs >to COBOL record descriptions thus opening up the ability to easily >call various IBM routines. > I wonder how much of this exists as PL/S, which might be a better place to start because the type information is more evident.
(I did say "exists" rather than "is available".) http://xkcd.com/1537/ -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
