In case anyone is interested. I just learned of this. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7568
Abstract The Secure Sockets Layer version 3.0 (SSLv3), as specified in RFC <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6101> 6101 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6101>, is not sufficiently secure. This document requires that SSLv3 not be used. The replacement versions, in particular, Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.2 (RFC 5246 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246>), are considerably more secure and capable protocols. This document updates the backward compatibility section of RFC 5246 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246> and its predecessors to prohibit fallback to SSLv3. -- Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted. Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be. He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
