On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 20:10:22 +0800, David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote:
>Curious. I suspect you may have an outlier somewhere that hasn't >included <strings.h>. You can test that theory by compiling your C code >with the CHECKOUT or LANG(STDC99) compiler options and checking the output. > I have done the compile with CHECKOUT and there are indeed a few remarks to make. The quality of the code can be improved... However, each and every compile unit has the <string.h> included. As far as I understand the documentation, that should really suffice for getting the builtin version of strncpy. O, and BTW, I do get the builtin version of strncat, which is used in the same piece of code... Should I do a PMR? Thanks and very best regards, Jantje. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
