On 2015-07-20 11:18, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> 
>> Documentation describes what's returned by the listdsi function as a
>> "function code".
> 
> Exactly; *not* as a return code.
>   
What's in a name?  I can sympathize with your pedantry in objecting
to the use of the acronym "USS" contrary to the definition in the
IBM glossaries.  AFAIK, there's no similar definition of "retcode".
If the programmer had named the variable "aardvark", would it likewise
be misleading insofar as it doesn't consume termites?

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to