Charles Mills wrote: >At a customer, I am apparently seeing SMFRTEST return code zero for type 17 >'SYS ' even though D SMF,O clearly shows that Type 17 is not enabled.
Sniffffff, it is smelling bad, like rotten eggs.... I'm smelling some weird exits.... Can you see how SMFRTEST is called? With what SUBTYPE and SUBSYS parameters? Yes, I see 'SYS ', but.... On what z/OS version do you see that anomaly? Do you see if IEEMB838 is front-ended or not? Please post the SMFPRMxx if you can. Do you see other SMF exits? >Parenthetically, does anyone know why CA would choose to implement an SVC >front-end that provides misleading information? Only CA which gives RC=00 for SMF type <= 90 except two of them? What are they doing with that macro's results? Granted, I believe they want to avoid weird abends, but I will not tolerate that misleading story. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
