Yep. And unlike customer and vendor written JNI applications IBM have
set the magic bit so that all the C/C++ code that JZOS executes also
runs on a zIIP.
I've been using JZOS a lot recently and it's a wonderful library.
On 11/08/2015 10:11 PM, Earl Hodil wrote:
Does anyone know if you can run on a zAAP from standard JES initiators?
Earl Hodil
Open Software Technologies
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Aug 2015 to 10 Aug 2015 (#2015-222)
There are 2 messages totaling 98 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Formal definituion of Speed Matching Buffer
2. Mixed COBOL ewnvironment and Ent. COBOL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:58:51 -0700
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Formal definituion of Speed Matching Buffer
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2015f.html#86 Formal definituion of Speed Matching
Buffer
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2015f.html#88 Formal definituion of Speed Matching
Buffer
For those that got post forwarded and can't see the recent URL refs on
garlic.com ... On 17Apr2015, garlic.com changed there webserver and still have
yet been able to update my personal web pages ... to see the full thread check
google group archive.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.ibm-main/K2Elt-40-VE
With regard to MVS MTBF 15min, I happened to mention in an internal
(only) report giving technical details of building a bullet proof and never
fail I/O subsystem ... which brought down wrath of the MVS organization on my
head ... apparently they would have gotten me fired if they couldn't figure out
how ... but they found other ways of taking out their displeasure.
VM370 official calypso support, put8201, reference to retrofitting to heavily
modified internal system.
To: wheeler
Date: 01/11/82 12:51:34
ref calypso-vm/sp (ext. ckd ) ;
The official release of the code was this month. Put tape 8201 lvl. 110. It
looks like it might be awhile before we get that far for common and all, right
? Maybe I should go ahead and work on fitting it to 106. What do you think?
... snip ...
from vmshare archives ... discussion of 3880 speed matching buffer but doesn't
explicitly say anything about define extent and eckd
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse?fn=3380&ft=MEMO
old email about FE error injection regression tests for 3380 ... all of the 57
errors were resulting in MVS hanging and requiring reipl and in 2/3rds of the
cases, there was no indication of what caused the problem (this is separate
from the earlier issue where they attempted to use MVS in the bldg. 14
engineering test lab and found it had 15min MTBF)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007.html#email801015
--
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:09:47 -0500
From: David Kartzman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Mixed COBOL ewnvironment and Ent. COBOL
Hi Tom...
I have a question based on a comment you made to Itzchak. You said:
"None specifically for the VS COBOL II modules. OTOH, when recompiling with
COBOL V5 we recommend a lot of testing, because it can reveal hidden
invalid COBOL programs. These programs could have been invalid for 20
or 30 years, but each new release generated the same instructions so
hte behavior was the same. With COBOL V5, these bad programs might
start getting the wrong answers. So, for every program recompiled
with COBOL V5 we recommend thorough regression testing."
I'm aware of the issue with the SEARCH ALL verb and the issue (described in
Appendix G) about the wrong length record being flagged now in COBOL 5. Are
there other issues that would force significant regression testing over and
above normal testing? Is your comment primarily for programs last compiled with
VS COBOL II?
Thanks in advance.
Dave Kartzman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
------------------------------
End of IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Aug 2015 to 10 Aug 2015 (#2015-222)
**************************************************************
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
