Why not 360? Or 512?
CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity

-------- Original message --------
From: Gary Weinhold <[email protected]> 
Date: 08/12/2015  10:26 AM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Aug 2015 to 11 Aug 2015 (#2015-223) 

And if I were Emperor of the universe, I'd adjust the earth's orbit to 
make sure it competed a revolution in exactly 365 days.

gary

On 2015-08-12 00:00, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system wrote:
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:19:38 -0500 From: Paul Gilmartin 
> <[email protected]> Subject: Leap (was: LOADING An AMODE64 Program) 
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:37:30 -0500, Joel Ewing wrote:
>> >
>> >Encyclopedia Britannica is complicit in the confusion to this day by
>> >incorrectly implying in their "Leap Year" entry that in addition to the
>> >divisible by 4, 100, 400 rules there either is or should be a 4000-year
>> >exception rule:
>> >"...For still more precise reckoning, every year evenly divisible by
>> >4,000 (i.e., 16,000, 24,000, etc.) may be a common (not leap) year",
>> >
>> >Over 18 years ago (Nov 1996) EB acknowledged that no such rule exists:
>> >it was an un-adopted and sub-optimal suggestion by Sir John Herschel
>> >around 1820.  EB has apparently not yet followed their own internal
>> >recommendation in 1996 "to reword this statement in the future".
>> >
> If I were Emperor of the Universe, I would make the rule:
>
>      Every year divisible by 4 except one divisible by 128 is a leap year.
>
> 365 31/128 is within one second of the mean tropical year; closer even
> than the 4000-year rule.
>
> The unpredictable secular increase in the length of the day makes a
> 4000-year rule pointless.
>
> -- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to