I knew I had to be missing something! Thank you very much John! "You're da best!" I'll give it a shot!
Regards, Leonardo Vaz -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: JES2 - get system name without JCT addressability. $CBIO doesn't work? It has an input parameter of MTTR with it says is a SPOOL TTR. ref: http://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/has2q000.pdf <quote> MTTR= Specifies the label of, or a register that contains, the spool track address of the record to be read or written. If you specify a register, the spool MTTR (module track record) must be loaded into the designated register before executing this macro instruction. MTTR is required for TYPE=READ or TYPE=WRITE, but is not allowed with TYPE=WAIT. </quote> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Leonardo Vaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the help guys! You understand my problem now, so from the > system I'm executing the command from It's not trivial to get the > system where the job is running, the easiest field I found is > JCTMVSNM, but JCT is probably not resident on the system I'm executing > the command from, I think that's why JQE points to the track on the > spool where I can find the JCT, but I still couldn't figure out how to read > that track on the spool. > > It doesn't sound something extraordinary, but something rather simple, > but I've learned a while ago that assembler is rarely simple. > > Thanks and regards, > Leonardo Vaz > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Charles Mills > Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JES2 - get system name without JCT addressability. > > Ah. It seemed like too simple an answer; that's why I was kind of > tentative. > At least now I understand the problem. > > Could one determine "which member of the JES plex" somehow and then > have a table that mapped that "which" to the actual system name? Or > does this have to be more portable than that (such as for a vendor product)? > > Charles > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of J O Skip Robinson > Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 4:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JES2 - get system name without JCT addressability. > > I was going to reply similarly, but I then noticed that OP is talking > about a running job, not necessarily the current system. A job can be > running on any member of the JES plex. I don't have an easy answer for > that question. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Schrodinger's backup: The condition of any backup is unknown until a restore is attempted. Yoda of Borg, we are. Futile, resistance is, yes. Assimilated, you will be. He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
