On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:48:10 +0300, Itschak Mugzach wrote: >you can send object code as IBM and other vendors does and let SMP link >it. Another option is to name the cobol source as Assembler, and replace >the assembler processor to IGYCRCTL. > Eek!
> ... The only problem i see is the many >work files the Cobol compiler uses and wouldn't be allocated by the >"assembler", but you can permanently allocate them via JCL. I would give it >a try. > I wouldn't. This is unworkable for a product that has actual assembler source in addition to COBOL. Better to deliver compiled ++MOD elements and only link in the field. How do vendors deliver COBOL products? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
