So the cache was loaded when you did the backup ...
CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973 740 5459 (tel) | [email protected] This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential information of CIT Group Inc. or its subsidiaries or affiliates (collectively, “CIT”), and are intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any use, disclosure, printing, copying or distribution, or reliance on the contents, of this communication is strictly prohibited. CIT disclaims any liability for the review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication by persons other than the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission, and immediately delete and destroy the communication and any accompanying materials. To the extent permitted by applicable law, CIT and others may inspect, review, monitor, analyze, copy, record and retain any communications sent from or received at this email address. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Restore time question No hardware changes. We restored our system to our dr box using our recovery system. Took 5:08. Brought up our system, then did a backup. Took 1:15 (and some other stuff was running). Tony Thigpen Rob Schramm wrote on 09/16/2015 03:29 PM: > Same tape subsystem? > > Rob Schramm > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015, 3:21 PM Tony Thigpen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Backing up and restoring a Dasd. >> >> Using ADRDSSU: >> DUMP FULL INDD(DASD) OUTDD(BACKUP) ALLD(*) ADMIN TOL(IOER) ALLE >> RESTORE FULL INDD(BACKUP) OUTDD(DASD) PRG CAN ADMIN >> >> All the dasd can be backed up in 1:15, but restore takes 5:08. >> >> Are we doing something wrong, or is this 4.5x longer normal? >> >> -- >> Tony Thigpen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO >> IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
