On 9/19/2015 3:26 PM, Hardee, Chuck wrote:
Thanks Jim, your explanation was helpful, believe it or not.
It bears out with what I am seeing.
I really appreciate your passing on your insights and discoveries in the code
when we ask questions.
Chuck
Charles (Chuck) Hardee
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
EAS Information Technology
Thermo Fisher Scientific
300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275
Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 (412) 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230
[email protected] | www.thermofisher.com
WORLDWIDE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient,
or an employee or agent of a system responsible for delivering the message to
the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please inform the sender and delete all copies.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 1:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IPCS BLS18028I message suppression
Interesting you should suggest that.
I did a batch IPCS run with my REXX and sure enough, in TSO/Batch
the BLS18028I is captured by OUTTRAP and my REXX displays it as
expected.
Question now is, why isn't it captured with the REXX is executed
interactively?
So, if IPCS is executed in interactive TSO, the BLS18028I messages
is issued to the "print" file that is displayed upon the terminal.
If, however, the same REXX is executed in TSO/Batch, the message is
captured by OUTTRAP and placed in the stem that was passed in the
first OUTTRAP call. It does not appear in the print file nor on the
output associated with SYSTSPRT.
Interesting.
Since the primary use of this REXX will be batch as opposed to
interactive, I can live with it I guess.
Just wish it would work the same regardless of environment.
C-
Charles (Chuck) Hardee
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
EAS Information Technology
When you executed the Rexx exec interactively, did you use tso exec, or
ipcs as the prefix to the command? I'm thinking IPCS rexx exec might
give you a different result.
Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
