Anyone got a clue why on earth the SWA stuff is in a DSECT and macro called ZB505? I see a bunch of other IEFZBnnn macros, which seem equally badly named. I'm quite frankly horrified.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Tom Marchant < [email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:33:01 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote: > > >I would expect that the issue is that your SWREQ plist has a bad address. > The > >0C4 is in the middle of the SWAREQ module. > > I wondered if that might be where the abend was. That's why I suggested > an SVCDUMP or SYSMDUMP. How did you determine that the abend was in > that module? > > As it happens, I recently had an abend in the SWAREQ module. In my case, > it was because I passed a bad SVA. The value that I passed was the first > three bytes of a word containing the SVA in the last three bytes. The low > bit was zero, meaning that it is the address of the SWA prefix. > > -- > Tom Marchant > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
