Timothy, 

With all due respect, it's real easy for you to say "So what!"  That is not a 
justification for exceeding our software budget where I work.  

As for talking with my friendly IBM representative, well, I can't find one.   
My IBM VAR was helpful and gave it their best shot in working with IBM on 
extending the SVC (there was a lot of discussion at SHARE that IBM would be 
willing to do so) but ultimately reported that IBM would not. 

I had not read about CMP until now.  That's interesting.  If I'm reading it 
right, we are ineligible until we upgrade our z10.  

Your point about the developer trial is noted.  Given our experience with this 
COBOL upgrade, we might look at this in the future.  

However, I submit that I was not incorrect nor was I complaining.  Perhaps I 
was incomplete in my understanding of all the methods IBM uses for software 
billing, so I could have added more qualifications to my statement, but that 
still would not have turned it into a complaint.  It is what it is, as they 
say.        

And, by the way, it's "Shirey".  As the great Leslie Nielsen used to say "Don't 
call me Shirley."  :-) 

Regards,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company 



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 1:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: COBOL V5.x and CSP descendants was Re: New and improved IBM 
migration recommendations for COBOL V5

Greg Shirley wrote:
>Unfortunately, it gets a bit complicated when the changes that need to 
>be tested in the compiler come at a version level.  Once you have 
>ordered a new version, you have a year to migrate off the old version, 
>or IBM begins charging you for running both.

I'm afraid you're simply incorrect and repeating a complaint that has already 
been well discussed and debunked in this very forum.

To revisit this topic in summary form, IBM provides at least two 
straightforward choices to avoid starting (or even having) the Single Version 
Charge (SVC) period:

1. Order the IBM Enterprise COBOL Developer Trial for z/OS. Use IBM program 
number 5655-TRY. You can conveniently order 5655-TRY on Shopz and get 
electronic delivery (in countries where Shopz is available) or order physical 
media (preferably DVD) elsewhere. Exactly as its name suggests it's a temporary 
evaluation license for non-production use of the full product. The trial 
license allows you to test and evaluate the value gained from Enterprise COBOL 
Version 5.2 before making a formal upgrade decision
-- including CSP, VisualAge Generator, and/or EGL (preferably EGL) performance 
checks if you wish. 5655-TRY does *not* initiate a SVC period.

2. Upgrade/switch to IBM Country Multiplex Pricing (CMP), introduced earlier 
this year. CMP is available at least as close to worldwide as possible. There 
are no SVC periods under CMP at all. CMP does away with SVC periods for *all* 
IBM software products.

There has also always been a third option: "Talk with your friendly IBM 
representative." No promises, but they tend to be reasonable people in my 
experience if you have a reasonable justification for an exception.

Even if you somehow manage to get past all three of these perfectly reasonable, 
viable options, and if you then somehow exceed your one year SVC period, "So 
what!" Enterprise COBOL Version 5.2 yields performance benefits on practically 
every program you let it recompile and re-optimize.
(How much? "It depends," but that's a fair generalization -- and see #1
above.) To the extent you can take advantage of Enterprise COBOL 5.2, even if 
it's not across 100% of your code portfolio, you (and your employer) are most 
likely a net winner in the efficiencies you pick up in your production 
environments. Even if you can recompile only a portion of your code portfolio 
that contributes to your peak utilization you still most likely win. Then there 
are the functional improvements, too.

Once again I share John Gilmore's frustration. :-(

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to