In <[email protected]>, on 11/02/2015 at 04:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>You may think this is contrived, but it's not novel. It's s form of >Goodman's Paradox: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_riddle_of_induction The second paragraph of "Grue and bleen defined" in that article is incoherent. The editor clearly has a different definition in mind from the one that he wrote. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
