On 26 November 2015 at 06:51, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > > The company wants to only be an insurance company. They are outsourcing > I.T. infrastructure. They have already outsourced the DBA function, new > business data entry, and claims data entry. I'm not sure about the > applications themselves. I do know that the software for the agents is > actually written by programmers in the agency company, as opposed to the > insurance / underwriting company (us).
So, um, what's left of an insurance company once it's outsourced all the data related functions? It's not like a company that bangs out widgets on a production line; the data is everything. Insurance is about pooling risk, and an insurance *company* exists to make a profit on pooling risk. Why would such a company need more than a CEO and a couple of actuaries on the payroll? Probably those could be outsourced too, saving even more money. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
