On 11 December 2015 at 09:29, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[email protected]> wrote: > An encoding form is not the thing encoded. > >>UTF-8 *is* Unicode, as are UTF-16 and UTF-32. > > No, they are transforms for Unicode.
You can't have it both ways. I said "UTF-8 *is* Unicode". You said "No, UTF-32 is Unicode". Now you're saying none of them is Unicode. It's Friday; I'm done. They're all Unicode. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
