On 2015-12-16, at 02:40, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote: > It is astonishing how many words this group needs to reply: "No". > Generally reasonable and relevant explanations in anticipation of the re-reply, "Why not?"
Even Shmuel, somewhat uncharacteristically, replied with more than a monosyllable. > -----Original Message----- > From: Elardus Engelbrecht > Sent: 16 December, 2015 10:37 > >> I have such; I use it primarily to escape the dreadful Fixed-80 burden. > > zSecure can escape that burden. I had to shorten my lines if I want to > re-submit a failed job it from SDSF... > Someday I may be in a mood to submit an SR on that, calling it a data integrity failure. Rather than quietly truncating, SDSF should enter an alert dialog with the user as ISPF does, warning of possible data truncation. And trailing blanks written to INTRDR are preserved in the spool. If re-submitting via SDSF strips those, I'll call that "data integrity", also. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
