This is a hot button of mine: going to extraordinary lengths to second guess
SMPE. Like Santa Claus, SMPE knows who's been naughty and who's been nice.
Goodies and lumps of coal will be distributed accordingly. GROUPEXTEND is
*always* in order. There's nothing wrong with RC 8. Resolvable hold chains
will be applied; unresolvable ones will be not. It's an utter waste of time
to build an exclude list just to achieve RC 0. That ploy is decades obsolete
and achieves nothing that SMPE won't deliver for free. 

.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
[email protected]
[email protected]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Longabaugh, Robert E
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 10:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Bulk] Re: PTF error clarification
> 
> Receive the HOLDDATA.  Then SMP/E checks for PE.  Do specify GROUPEXTEND
> (or GEXT).
> 
> Bob Longabaugh
> CA Technologies
> Storage Management QA
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:48 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PTF error clarification
> 
> In
> <CAHTvvRWDf2dxp6Wd-
> [email protected]>,
> on 12/22/2015
>    at 05:32 PM, Jake Anderson <[email protected]> said:
> 
> >Does that mean, I have to receive the APAR
> 
> If there is a PTF that resolves the APAR, receive that. If not, and there
is an APAR
> fix, receive that. Either way, specify group extend.
> But first check for PE.
> 
> --
>      Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to