On Jan 28, 2016, at 4:24 PM, Stevet wrote:
Hmmm. IIRC, IBM asked customers for input as to addressing needs
of COBOL.
I understood that 64bit addressing was heard loud and clear.
Sent from iPhone - small keyboard fat fingers - expect spellinf
errots.
Stevet:
Look at the archives on IBM-Main.
Ed
Since COBOL does not and will not in the foreseeable future need
amode 64 I find the argument un helpful.
Ed
--
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended
recipient or an authorized representative of the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and
delete the message and any attachments from your system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-
MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
