On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 00:41:22 +0000, Bigendian Smalls wrote:

>The answer may be in compiling it to be Unicode based.   Gonna look into it 
>with the extra 'round tuits.  
> 
In the UTF-8 representation, then, please.  UTF-8 is a marvelously compatible
superset of USASCII.  Near zero (well, at worst minimal) effort to adapt.  And
it's the de facto World Wide Web standard.

Don't indulge in wishful thinking that a Unicode based compiler can smoothly
accept eiter ASCII or EBCDIC source code.  The EBCDIC will need to be
converted.

>> On Feb 19, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>> 
>> AFAIK that version is strictly EBCDIC, intended to be run using JCL in batch 
>> jobs accessing EBCDIC datasets.  It uses a customized EBCDIC version of the 
>> PDCLib library routines (public domain C library code).
>>  
But an 8-character limit is absurd.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to