I have been using CA-RECLAIM since 20012 for both dfHSM and dfRMM. No problems or worries. I highly recommend it. As a matter of fact it is a shop-wide default here.
SET CA-RECLAIM(DATACLAS) in IGDSMS00. The default for each DATACLAS is CA-RECLAIM(YES). One caveat. You don’t get the benefit until the clusters are redefined. HTH, <snip> I don't want to create a gorilla-survey here, but I would be interested in hearing some user experience with CA Reclaim. I first heard about it at SHARE several years ago, but we have yet to dip a toe in the crocodile pond. It would be most beneficial for system utility clusters like HSM and RMM, but that's the last arena I would want to encounter a problem. </snip> This email � including attachments � may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, distribute or act on it. Instead, notify the sender immediately and delete the message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
