no recompile involved. Just relink to replace IBM's LE modules. Itschak
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Mark Regan <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a ComputerWeekly article on this product at > > http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/quocirca-insights/2016/03/the-software-defined-mainframe.html > . > I noticed that the article author needs to know how to spell the acronym > for EBCDIC correctly. He spells it 'EBSDIC' and did it twice. > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:04 AM Elardus Engelbrecht < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Joel C. Ewing wrote: > > > > >I notice they also claim "no need for recompilation of Cobol or PL/1 > > application programmes, no source code changes, or changes to operational > > procedures". > > > > I am really struggling to swallow that claim... > > > > and Dave_Craig wrote: > > > > >Queue the IP lawyers, and action! > > > > This is why I said this is 'interesting development'. I am very sure big > > blue and their lawyers won't like that one bit unless there is an > agreement. > > > > > I'll be slow to migrate off that proven decades-old mission-critical > > platform, that's for sure. > > > > I will also be slow to get off the mainframes. > > > > Joel C. Ewing wrote: > > > > >Color me skeptical. > > > > With all the colors of the rainbow! ;-) > > > > Groete / Greetings > > Elardus Engelbrecht > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
