Fixing PTF UO01807 is available today. Final APAR text also explains why you get 'Welcome to SMP/E' the first time you try split screen. Same cause as empty CSI list.
. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-302-7535 Office robin...@sce.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:27 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMP/E split screen in z/OS 2.1 IO24370 has closed PER. PTFs forthcoming. <snip> -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 7:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMP/E split screen in z/OS 2.1 IBM has taken APAR IO24370 for this problem. <snip> -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:46 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMP/E split screen in z/OS 2.1 I've conjured up an init Rexx that more or less handles the file allocations. However both Tom Conley and I independently uncovered an actual (APARable) problem with the candidate CSI list on the second (split) screen, which is displayed if the CSI name is blank. I've submitted an SR at Kurt's suggestion. More to follow. <snip> -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pinnacle Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 1:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: (External):Re: SMP/E split screen in z/OS 2.1 On 3/8/2016 3:54 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > I'm finally in a position to explore SMP/E split screen in z/OS 2.1. > 'Forever' I've had an exec that allocates SMP/E libraries, does LIBDEFs, > ALTLIB, etc., then undoes all that on the way out. The same initialization > exec won't work in split screen mode because of files that are already > allocated and/or open in the original screen. I got around initialization > with some changes, but I still get nastygrams if I try to exit the dialog in > the same order. That is, close the first screen, then the second. > > I poked around the interweb but do not find any clear example of how to make > this work. Am I missing something obvious? > <snip> Skip, You'll just have to use REUSE on SMPTLIB and leave it allocated. I have had a hard time solving this one. Regards, Tom Conley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
