That's correct, Tom, apologies for not making that clear. See here: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=b78d2926-c112-4def-adc1-0e315531fef9&ps=25
Why even that wasn't mentioned in the announcement, I don't know. On Friday, 1 April 2016 03:41:32 UTC+1, Tom Marchant wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:17:40 -0400, Don Poitras <[email protected]> wrote: > > >In article <[email protected]> you > >wrote: > > > >> Yes, it uses 64-bit addressing, so has much more available space, > >> specifically for large programs, including generated ones. > > > >If so, they didn't make it obvious in the announcement. I don't see > >anything about 64-bit. > > I think Bill means that the compiler runs AMODE(64), not that it can generate > AMODE(64) programs. > > -- > Tom Marchant > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
