I probably will/would do something like this. But, I doubt we'll ever get to COBOL 5 anyway. Still using Enterprise 3.1.0
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 1:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Advice needed - GRS across 2 sysplexes with > shared dasd > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Gibney, David Allen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I only shared a minimum set of volumes. Vary offline commands in > COMMNDxx. > > Very few, if any PDS/E on these volumes and all are read-only after > > creation. > > > > This COBOL-5 requirement for a PDS/E load library will complicate my > > transfers from development to test and production as that is currently > > a shared library which is only written from one lpar. > > > > > Have you considered: system1:pdse1 -> (iebcopy) -> shared sequential -> > system2:pdse2 ? > > > > -- > How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb? One to hold the > giraffe and one to fill the bathtub with brightly colored power tools. > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
