On 29/04/2016 10:30 PM, John McKown wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Mike Schwab <[email protected]>
wrote:
Well, the obvious solution is to code the eyecatcher literals before
the entry point. It will be less obvious that the eyecatcher is part
of the program (and not the end of the previous program) but as the
technique become more widespread it should become more trusted.
IBM has a ton of recoding to do. I've seen this type of thing in a _lot_
of IBM routines.
Indeed! Including SVC routines which show up in our profiling!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN