Problem solved. $DJOBCLASS,DUPL_JOB identified one errant class and 
$TJOBCLASS(x),DUPL_JOB=DELAY fixed it.

Now to find out how one class got that setting.....

Thanks Lizette.

Bob                                                          

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 9:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Duplicate jobs running concurrently even with DUPL_JOB=DELAY

What level of z/OS are you running?

Next, can you post the following output of the commands $DJOBDEF
$DJOBCLASS(x)  where X is the class where you are seeing this issue?


If you specify DUPL_JOB=DELAY on the JOBDEF statement or DUPL_JOB=DELAY is the 
default, no two batch jobs with the same name will execute at the same time in 
the MAS, except when DUPL_JOB=NODELAY is specified on the JOBCLASS(x) statement.

If you specify DUPL_JOB=NODELAY on the JOBDEF statement, jobs with the same 
name can run at the same time, no matter what DUPL_JOB= is specified on the
JOBCLASS(x) statement.

Lizette


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 5:36 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Duplicate jobs running concurrently even with DUPL_JOB=DELAY
> 
> I am experiencing a strange event at the moment and was wondering if 
> this has happened to others.
> 
> Just this morning, jobs with duplicate names have been running 
> concurrently even though we are running with DUPL_JOB=DELAY
> 
> Has anyone else seen this recently?
> 
> Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to