On 20 June 2016 at 11:02, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: > It was just a Friday question, as I said. No real problem here. I just > have this "why? whatever for" thought every time I look at the WAIT > documentation.
If you process a lot of trace tables (which IIRC you do), it might be interesting to scan for WAIT entries with R0 <> 1. (Well, the high bit is for LONG=YES, so you'd have to filter that out.) This would perhaps tell you if there is any routine, or at least frequent, use of this kind of WAIT on a system. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
