Give APL\360 another shot: http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/the-apl-programming-language-source-code/
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > John McKown wrote: > >>http://xkcd.com/1695/ > > Haha! Good one! ;-D > > John, I remember that you posted this below reply of this on 5 Aug 2009 where > you replied that APL2 is "better": > >>Mark T. Regan, K8MTR >> Subject: Fwd: How To Write Unmaintainable Code >> How To Write Unmaintainable Code Ensure a job for life ;-) > >> http://freeworld.thc.org/root/phun/unmaintain.html?repost=forPosterity > > That website is still Ok and fun to read! > > > Apparently according to Gary Green and other posters (Bruce Black et al.) you > could write whole program in ONE line using APL with those characters > designed for that languange! > > Gary Green said on Wed, 23 May 2007 in thread 'Re: Non-Standard Mainframe > Language?' this: > > "I tried APL once, back in 77. I thought it was the perfect programming > language. One could write an entire program on/in one line of code. " > > Talking about quality of code! ;-D > > Is it Friday today? > > Groete / Greetings > Elardus Engelbrecht > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
