On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Steve Austin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks John I had not seen that. > Isn't it a really _nasty_ way to force the C compiler down people's throat? In order to use AMODE 64 && LE, you __must__ write the "main" routine in C. Even if all it does is call an assembler routine which does all the real work. > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: 13 July 2016 15:34 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: 64-bit XPLINK LE assembler program initialisation error U4093 > reason X'218' (536) > > Please excuse the top post. Have you seen this from > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceeam00/ceeam109.htm > : > > <quote> > > Any AMODE 64 assembler routine that is used within the scope of a Language > Environment application must use 64-bit XPLINK save area conventions. > Note: > > 1. Language Environment-conforming AMODE 64 assembler main routines are > not supported. > 2. Language Environment does not support the linkage stack. > > > </quote> > > Observer note #1. Now, I know _zero_ about 64 bit LE, but the above says, > to me, "you can't get there from here" (not even by adding a "t"). > > -- "Pessimism is a admirable quality in an engineer. Pessimistic people check their work three times, because they're sure that something won't be right. Optimistic people check once, trust in Solis-de to keep the ship safe, then blow everyone up." "I think you're mistaking the word optimistic for inept." "They've got a similar ring to my ear." >From "Star Nomad" by Lindsay Buroker: Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
