I am not thinking of moving this in production it may help me track down a 
problem  

Joe Reichman
Joe Reichman
 
IT Specialist
Master Files Division
New Carrollton Federal Building, B7-182
OS:CTO:AD:CP:I:IB
Flex M,T,Th,F
Home office (240) 863 - 3965 
Office (240) 613-4350
Cell     (917) 748-9693
TOD M - F  7:30 am  - 4:00 pm


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 10:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bsam VS Qsam for VB records

I wonder what application it is that justifies considering this. It is not the 
80's anymore. And even with QSAM you have the BUFNO parameter. 
If you really want to go down to the details, consider EXCP (I did, 35 years 
ago).

Kees.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of John McKown
Sent: 19 July, 2016 16:24
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bsam VS Qsam for VB records

IOW - unless you are very clever and you have a real need for I/O overlap 
performance, and you don't mind the maintenance programmer cussing you out, 
then I'd just go with QSAM.

--
********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************
                        


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to