Yes, I found nothing in the Unix, LE or C/C++ services that perform an ENQ of any kind, be it for control or for testing availability.
I agree, the only real reason someone other than myself would need to do anything to the code is to reassemble it if the ENQ macro were to change. Since it would be single function, test if QName/RName is available or not, I would suspect the code wouldn't have to be changed, if ever. I am just trying to do due diligence and make sure I'm not reinventing the wheel. Thanks! C- Charles (Chuck) Hardee Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration EAS Information Technology Thermo Fisher Scientific 300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275 Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 (412) 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230 [email protected] | www.thermofisher.com WORLDWIDE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent of a system responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender and delete all copies. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Woodger Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 11:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: OS ENQ from COBOL There's nothing native in COBOL to do an what you want, and I'm not aware of anything in LE as a callable service. Hybrid. Documentation. Probably the most they'll need is how to reassemble it. Unless a macro changes, why else would they ever need to touch it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
