Cheryl's list is a wonderful resource but it cannot be considered definitive, especially with regard to exit numbers, and it is certainly not "binding" on IBM. You just cannot assume that a certain SMF record type will always come through a certain exit (unless it is a user type and you have control over the writing process). You might be good for a day, a week or a year assuming that all SMF Type 'x' records came through a particular IEFU8n, but you cannot count on it, not for all situations and certainly not for future releases of z/OS.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Blaicher, Christopher Y. Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70 According to Watson/Walker it is IEFU83. See: http://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/watsonwalker/ww/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/09233352/SMF-Reference-20150926.pdf Chris Blaicher Technical Architect Mainframe Development Syncsort Incorporated 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: 201-930-8234 | M: 512-627-3803 E: [email protected] www.syncsort.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Hare Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 11:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IEFU8* exit points and RMF type 70 Bringing this back up again because I still haven't found the answer yet. Are SMF type 70s written by RMF via branch-entry, requiring me to use IEFU85 exit point to examine them, or can I use just IEFU83 or IEFU84 ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
