Hi Ed, If you are curious as to what RACF exits installations are using, see our survey of a few years ago. (Beware of line wrap.)
http://www.rshconsulting.com/surveys/RSH_Consulting__RACF_Survey_013__Exits.pdf Regards, Bob Robert S. Hansel Lead RACF Specialist RSH Consulting, Inc. 617-969-8211 www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel http://twitter.com/RSH_RACF www.rshconsulting.com -----Original Message----- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:47:57 -0700 From: Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> Subject: Re: ICHPWX01 sample problem On 9/1/2016 10:18 AM, Tom Conley wrote: > On 9/1/2016 12:48 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote: >> >> "If you change an exit, except IRREVX01 and IRRVAF01, you must re-IPL >> MVS™ for the changes to take effect. IRREVX01 and IRRVAF01 are defined >> to the dynamic exits facility, and you can update them without >> re-IPLing." >> > > Baby steps. Haha! I ain't never messed with EVX01 or VAF01 ... only PWX01. Good thing I gotta sandbox and lotsa time... :-\ Dynamic exit capability doesn't help much (or at all) if it's not implemented for the exits you actually need. Design Thinking might suggest a customer survey to find out which exits folks are _actually_ using and make those dynamic. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
