Init then target? That would be a natural use. Init then source? That would be an error.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Bill Woodger <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, so far looks good. Need to see documentation. > > Waiting for its counterpart, INITSTUPID, for where data is initialised, and > then next reference is as a target. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
