On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 06:25:19 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:

>@John, am I correct that if they are west of Greenwich (the Americas, 
>basically) they've got a real problem if the TOD clock is set to local time 
>and they want to "make it right"? Basically, they have to let the box sit idle 
>for five or more hours so that actual UTC time catches up to their previous 
>TOD clock setting, and DB2 does not step all over itself?
>
>If OTOH they are in the UK or east of Greenwich (EMEA, Asia) then things are 
>much simpler: just set the TOC clock correctly, set the timezone, and go, 
>correct?
> 
Other way around, but yes.  A few years ago someone here lamented being
in such a situation.  I don't know whether it was ever made right.

And why does ISPF persist in keeping member timestamps in civil time?

And why does a TSO TRANSMIT followed by a RECEIVE on oppsite sides of
the DST boundary (I avoid the word "change"; it's a symptom of a
pernicious mindset) cause the timestamp to be in error by an hour?

--gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to