If you have a product like ASG's PROJCL + Database (INFO something) 
Or SEA Software's JCLPLUS + Database, that can actually help relate JCL and
Program Codes.

Lizette 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 9:06 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OS/VS COBOL - FD DCB vs JCL DCB
> 
> Classification: Public
> We do have a source manager (Panvalet in this particular case), but this is a
> big-bang approach, so it's a bulk exercise rather than piece-meal.
> 
> The CBT is a possibility, though I'll have to look at that from home as I'm
> prevented from downloading useful things like ZIP files from the internet at
> work!
> 
> Andy Styles
> z/Series Systems Programmer
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: 14 November 2016 15:56
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OS/VS COBOL - FD DCB vs JCL DCB
> 
> -- This email has reached the Bank via an external source --
> 
> 
> Are you using a source manager (Endevor, Changeman, home grown?) and could
> that be incorporated into the process?
> 
> Or could you use ISPF Search function (batch or foreground)?  Or use something
> like IPOUPDTE (just to scan not to update)?
> 
> I think there are many options.
> 
> Have you looked on CBTTAPE.ORG to see if there are any COBOL Source scanners?
> 
> 
> Lizette
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 8:42 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: OS/VS COBOL - FD DCB vs JCL DCB
> >
> > Classification: Public
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are converting some archaic programs written in OS/VS COBOL to
> > Enterprise COBOL (only to v4 at present). One of the issues that we've
> > hit, well documented in the migration guide, is that some programs
> > have DCB information that differs to that used in the JCL. OS/VS COBOL
> > overrides any JCL DCB information transparently, whereas Enterprise
> > COBOL fails with an OPEN failure.
> >
> > Whilst we can fix any failures as we go, questions are being asked
> > whether we can perform any scanning across programs and JCL and
> > datasets to identify the impact up front.
> >
> > We can obviously write some REXX to scan various components, but has
> > anyone already done anything like this that they are willing to share
> > that would give us a head start?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Andy Styles
> > z/Series Systems Programmer
> >

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to