On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 17:55:54 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>
>Re #1, if an existing application is being happily called from a shell
>script, and the user really doesn't want to modify that, I guess they could
>add an *outer* Rexx program that did the BPXWDYN and then called the
>original shell script.though now it's starting to feel a bit matryoshka-ish!
> 
It's the UNIX way: lotsa little things that connect, or perhaps nest, nicely.

Can we take this out of the hypothetical arena?  May I infer that today
the "application" is being happily called from JCL or TSO, and a user who
wishes to enable the option adds a DD statement to JCL or an ALLOCATE
to TSO?

Is the application in LINKLIST?  STEPLIB?  Elsewhere (specify)  LINKLIST
is the only easy case.  It's always pretty hard to change STEPLIB.  I
might be able to suggest a way; another doll I haven't played with.  But
not if it's a STEPLIB involving uncatalogued data sets.

And you want to make this application available under UNIX with as
little cognitive dissonance to the user as possible?

With more detail, I might be able to suggest a more specific solution.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to