Heh, as soon as I saw "I am unsure what an auditor it thinking" I knew we'd get a rant from someone, John! Not disagreeing, mind...
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:17 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think those tasks setup up themselves at IPL Time with the Security > > levels they need and may not do much with the SAF. I am unsure what an > > auditor it thinking. > > > > In my experience, the auditors in the field don't think. They are clerks > with a list of entries to be "checked off". > > > > > > > There is nothing that can use those address spaces - only z/OS > > > > If services, for example in SMS, are requested, then SMS would use the > > USER's - doing the request - credentials. > > > > You might also want to ask on the RACF List to see what they say. They > > probably have more of an idea about auditors. > > > > I think you can guess my idea about auditors. > > > > > > > To join, if you have not done so, you can use this URL > > RACF http://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/racf-l.html > > > > However, if it makes the auditor happy and it causes no harm, why not? > > > > Pandering to the ignorant, rather than requiring them to be competent? > > > > > > Lizette > > > > > Hum, I guess most can tell that my experience with auditors has never been > good. And I'm actually being very polite compared to what I'm muttering > under my breath. > > -- > Heisenberg may have been here. > > Unicode: http://xkcd.com/1726/ > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
