It's misleading the unit of work is really the RB

One more somewhat pertinent question in a address space if the unit of work is 
a SRB that address is ASCBSAWQ 




> On Dec 27, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/27/2016 9:51 AM, Joe Reichman wrote:
>> That term is okay the issue I have is with the term Multitasking is 
>> MultiRBing
> 
> There is no such term as MultiRBing.
> 
> When multitasking, each TCB represents an independent, asynchronous unit of 
> work to the MVS dispatcher.
> 
> RBs merely represent a form of procedural call stacking, implemented in 
> software, within a single TCB.
> 
> -- 
> Edward E Jaffe
> Phoenix Software International, Inc
> 831 Parkview Drive North
> El Segundo, CA 90245
> http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to