Salva Carrasco wrote:

>> How did you find it out? Experiencing abends with SMF processing jobs or 
>> having problems with Logstreams? 
>> Or just simply excellent eye-balling the records?
>>I see you have posted a sample SMF record 80, is that field SMF80USR? (offset 
>>19 as per your post)

>No abends or errors. An in-house Rexx failed when reading SMF14, 61, ... And a 
>RACF Audit Report was showing incorrect value at the first username char on 
>some lines.

Many thanks. Just as I expected, some invalid values in post processing these 
records. Thanks again!

I once got a similar (sort of) error many years ago, but it was the offset + 
length of a segment of a record which changed due to an APAR or upgrade, can't 
remember which was it.

Just a re-assemble of an Assembler program using the latest SMF mapping in a 
macro resolved that problem. ;-)


>(The Apar is now available for registered users: 
>https://www-304.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=isg1OA51823)

Thanks. Perhaps we will go to z/OS v2.2 next year... ;-)

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to