Salva Carrasco wrote: >> How did you find it out? Experiencing abends with SMF processing jobs or >> having problems with Logstreams? >> Or just simply excellent eye-balling the records? >>I see you have posted a sample SMF record 80, is that field SMF80USR? (offset >>19 as per your post)
>No abends or errors. An in-house Rexx failed when reading SMF14, 61, ... And a >RACF Audit Report was showing incorrect value at the first username char on >some lines. Many thanks. Just as I expected, some invalid values in post processing these records. Thanks again! I once got a similar (sort of) error many years ago, but it was the offset + length of a segment of a record which changed due to an APAR or upgrade, can't remember which was it. Just a re-assemble of an Assembler program using the latest SMF mapping in a macro resolved that problem. ;-) >(The Apar is now available for registered users: >https://www-304.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?uid=isg1OA51823) Thanks. Perhaps we will go to z/OS v2.2 next year... ;-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
