On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:21 AM scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote:
I wrote C program using threads some time ago and did a 'd OMVS pid=' and saw the two TCBs , I will drag it out , do the command and post.. Scott > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:06 PM Paul Gilmartin < > [email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:58:03 -0800, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote: > > > > > >> Decades ago, I had experimented with similar techniques, even so far as > > >> paired +- RLDs. In the course of that, I discovered that CMS obeys its > > >> own rules. If I had unresolved WXTRN + absolute offset, it got > relocated > > >> anyway because CMS assumed the nonzero result meant the WXTRN was > > >> resolved. > > > > > >re: > > >http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016h.html#98 A Christmassy PL/I tale > > >http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016h.html#101 Multitasking question > > > > > >part of the issue was that CMS had a 64kbyte os/360 system services > > >simulation implementation. With the introduction of MVS ... and its > > >8mbyte kernel image ... there was a joke that CMS 64kbyte os/360 system > > >services simulation was significantly more effective than the MVS 8mbyte > > >os/360 system services simulation. > > > > > If by "more effective" one means that CMS produced incorrect results faster > > than OS produced correct results ... > > > > And OS emulation I/O ignored Length Indicate reported by CP. > > > > And OS emulation failed to count the 4-byte RDW for RECFM=VB. > > > > ... but that made it plenty fast. > > > > -- gil > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
