On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:

> > "No company will pay you as much to STAY as another will pay you to GO"
>
> As an entrepreneur interested in employee retention I gave this a lot of
> thought. Why should this be? After all, one would think you should be more
> valuable where you already are: you're all trained, there is no need for a
> reference check, your co-workers are used to working with you, etc., etc.
>

​I think the OP was talking more about large companies. Why is it? Well, as
best as I can tell, it's all about the bonus that a manager will get by
keeping costs down. About 23 years ago, I mentioned that a release of
critical software was becoming unsupported (CICS) and​ we needed to upgrade
to the current version to be supported. His reply (honest!) was that the
current version ran fine; upgrading would cost money; increasing the budget
would decrease his bonus; so it was not going to happen. People do what is
"measured" and "honored". That also why a CEO will fire low level workers
and take a bonus for doing so. At least, that is this grunt's opinion.


> I decided it was a management failure -- and even more a co-worker failure
> -- to see an employee as s/he could be rather than as s/he was when s/he
> was hired. The interviewer sees you as you are today and where you could be
> in a couple of years; your boss, and especially your co-workers, remember
> that newbie doofus they hired five years ago.
>
> I resolved to do better, to try to see people as they could be. I would
> like to think I had some success.
>
> For a small company, as I had, if you do things correctly you have the
> opposite problem. A small company can sustain growth of 30% or so a year
> fairly readily, and even higher when you are tiny. Most employees do not
> grow that fast: they aren't 30% better every year. So you don't have a
> problem with employees outgrowing their jobs; you have a problem of job
> requirements outpacing employees. You start out billing $500K/year and hire
> a clerk to handle the invoicing. With 30% compounded growth, five years
> later you are a two million dollar company. That clerk has probably not
> grown in five years into an accountant suitable for a two million dollar
> company. Yes, you can train people, but not very fast. 9 out of 10
> employees do not like to be pushed out of their comfort zones.
>
> Charles
>


-- 
Our calculus classes are an integral part of your education.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to