What I meant was a PR instruction de-activates the recovery routines 



> On Feb 12, 2017, at 4:54 AM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 04:36:59 -0500 Joseph Reichman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> :>FRB ? Do you mean FRR also dies that mean an FRR to provides protection in 
> the context of the current RB
> 
> The FRR would probably be driven with an 0F8
> 
> :>Thing is I also Read the a PR instruction de-activates the FRR that's even 
> worse 
> 
> The MVS support for PR drops the FRR? Didn't know that.
> 
> :>> On Feb 12, 2017, at 3:23 AM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> :>> 
> :>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 19:19:24 -0500 Joe Reichman <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> :>> 
> :>> :>*    Also a ESATE only covers an RB while a FRR cover a TCB
> :>> 
> :>> What does that mean?
> :>> 
> :>> The RB cannot change while the FRB is providing protection as that 
> requires an
> :>> SVC.
> 
> --
> Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
> http://www.dissensoftware.com
> 
> Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
> 
> 
> Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
> you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
> 
> I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
> especially those from irresponsible companies.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to